Misuse detection method, misuse detection electronic control unit, and misuse detection system

ABSTRACT

A misuse detection electronic control unit in a vehicle network system including a plurality of electronic control units that communicate with one another through buses in accordance with a CAN protocol includes a transceiver unit that performs a reception step of receiving a target data frame and a reference data frame transmitted through the buses, wherein the target data frame is a data frame having a first identifier and wherein the reference data frame is a data frame having a second identifier different from the first identifier and a misuse detection process unit that performs a detection step of performing, as misuse detection for the target data frame, evaluation in accordance with a reception timing of the reference data frame and a reception timing of the target data frame on the basis of a certain rule specifying a reception interval between the reference data frame and the target data frame.

BACKGROUND 1. Technical Field

The present disclosure relates to a technique for detecting transmissionof an unauthorized frame in a vehicle network in which electroniccontrol units communicate with one another.

2. Description of the Related Art

During these years, a large number of devices called “electronic controlunits (ECUs)” are provided in a system inside an automobile. A networkconnecting these ECUs with one another is called a “vehicle network”. Alot of standards exist for vehicle networks. A standard called a“controller area network (CAN)” specified in International Organizationfor Standardization (ISO) 11898-1 exists for one of principal vehiclenetworks.

In the CAN, a communication path is configured by two buses, and ECUsconnected to the buses are called “nodes”. The nodes connected to thebuses communicate messages called “frames”. A transmission node, whichtransmits a frame, applies voltage to the two buses to generate apotential difference between the buses and transmit a value of “1”called a “recessive” and a value of “0” called a “dominant”. If aplurality of transmission nodes transmit a recessive and a dominant atexactly the same timing, the dominant takes priority in transmission. Ifa format of a received frame is abnormal, a reception node transmits aframe called an “error frame”. An error frame refers to successivetransmission of 6 bits of dominants for notifying a transmission nodeand other reception nodes of an abnormality in a frame.

In the CAN, there are no identifiers (IDs) identifying destinations andsources. A transmission node transmits each frame with an ID added (thatis, transmits a signal to the buses), and each reception node receivesonly a frame having a predetermined ID (that is, reads a signal from thebuses). In addition, a carrier sense multiple access/collision avoidance(CSMA/CA) method is employed, and when a plurality of nodessimultaneously perform transmission, mediation is carried out usingmessage IDs. That is, a frame whose message ID is smaller takes priorityin transmission.

In a vehicle network system according to the CAN, there is a threat thatan attacker might access busses and transmit an unauthorized frame toimproperly control ECUs, and security measures are being examined.

A vehicle network monitoring apparatus described in Japanese Patent No.5664799, for example, implements a misuse detection method in which aframe transmitted to busses of the CAN is determined to be unauthorizedif a difference between a reception interval measured in relation to theframe and a predetermined communication interval falls outside aspecified reference range.

SUMMARY

In one general aspect, the techniques disclosed here feature a misusedetection method used in a vehicle network system including a pluralityof electronic control units that communicate with one another throughbuses in accordance with a CAN protocol. The misuse detection methodincludes receiving a target data frame and a reference data frame whichare transmitted through the buses, wherein the target data frame is adata frame having a first identifier and wherein the reference dataframe is a data frame having a second identifier different from thefirst identifier and performing, as misuse detection for the target dataframe, evaluation in accordance with a reception timing of the referencedata frame and a reception timing of the target data frame on the basisof a certain rule specifying a reception interval between the referencedata frame and the target data frame.

According to the present disclosure, a possibility of erroneouslydetecting an authorized frame as an unauthorized frame is reduced evenif an unauthorized node is connected to buses of the CAN and anunauthorized frame is transmitted, and the transmission of theunauthorized frame can be appropriately detected.

It should be noted that general or specific embodiments may beimplemented as a system, a method, an integrated circuit (IC), acomputer program, a storage medium, or any selective combinationthereof.

Additional benefits and advantages of the disclosed embodiments willbecome apparent from the specification and drawings. The benefits and/oradvantages may be individually obtained by the various embodiments andfeatures of the specification and drawings, which need not all beprovided in order to obtain one or more of such benefits and/oradvantages.

BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF THE DRAWINGS

FIG. 1 is a diagram illustrating the overall configuration of a vehiclenetwork system according to a first embodiment;

FIG. 2 is a diagram illustrating a format of a data frame specified in aCAN protocol;

FIG. 3 is a diagram illustrating a format of an error frame specified inthe CAN protocol;

FIG. 4 is a configuration diagram of a misuse detection ECU according tothe first embodiment;

FIG. 5 is a diagram illustrating an example of rule information held bya rule holding portion in the misuse detection ECU according to thefirst embodiment;

FIG. 6 is a diagram illustrating an example of reception timinginformation stored in a reception timing holding portion in the misusedetection ECU according to the first embodiment;

FIG. 7 is a configuration diagram of an ECU according to the firstembodiment;

FIGS. 8A and 8B are diagrams illustrating examples of data framestransmitted by ECUs according to the first embodiment;

FIG. 9 is a diagram illustrating an example of a misuse detectionoperation performed by the misuse detection ECU on data frames accordingto the first embodiment;

FIG. 10 is a flowchart illustrating a misuse detection process performedby the misuse detection ECU when a data frame is received according tothe first embodiment;

FIG. 11 is a diagram illustrating the overall configuration of a vehiclenetwork system according to a second embodiment;

FIG. 12 is a configuration diagram of a misuse detection ECU accordingto the second embodiment;

FIG. 13 is a diagram illustrating an example of rule information held bya rule holding portion in the misuse detection ECU according to thesecond embodiment;

FIG. 14 is a diagram illustrating an example of reception stateinformation held by a reception state holding portion in the misusedetection ECU according to the second embodiment;

FIG. 15 is a diagram illustrating an example of a data frame transmittedby an ECU according to the second embodiment;

FIG. 16 is a diagram illustrating an example of a misuse detectionoperation performed by the misuse detection ECU on data frames accordingto the second embodiment;

FIG. 17 is a diagram illustrating another example of the misusedetection operation performed by the misuse detection ECU on data framesaccording to the second embodiment; and

FIG. 18 is a flowchart illustrating a misuse detection process performedby the misuse detection ECU when a data frame is received according tothe second embodiment.

DETAILED DESCRIPTION Underlying Knowledge Forming Basis of PresentDisclosure

According to a misuse detection method of Japanese Patent No. 5664799,if a plurality of frames are received within a reference range based ona predetermined communication interval, an unauthorized frametransmitted by an attacker might be included in the plurality of frames.If a reference range based on the predetermined communication intervalis determined for a determination as to a frame to be received next onthe basis of a reception timing of the unauthorized frame within thereference range, an authorized frame can consequently be determined tobe unauthorized.

The present disclosure provides a misuse detection method by which apossibility of erroneously detecting an authorized frame as anunauthorized frame is reduced even if an unauthorized frame is receivedwithin a range of errors of a predetermined communication interval andmisuse detection can be appropriately performed. In addition, thepresent disclosure provides a misuse detection electronic control unit(misuse detection ECU), which is an ECU capable of achieving the misusedetection method, and a misuse detection system that achieves the misusedetection method.

A misuse detection method according to an aspect of the presentdisclosure is a misuse detection method used in a vehicle network systemincluding a plurality of electronic control units that communicate withone another through buses in accordance with a CAN protocol. The misusedetection method includes receiving a target data frame and a referencedata frame which are transmitted through the buses, wherein the targetdata frame is a data frame having a first identifier and wherein thereference data frame is a data frame having a second identifierdifferent from the first identifier and performing, as misuse detectionfor the target data frame, evaluation in accordance with a receptiontiming of the reference data frame and a reception timing of the targetdata frame on the basis of a certain rule specifying a receptioninterval between the reference data frame and the target data frame. Asa result, since a data frame having an ID different from an ID of a dataframe subjected to misuse detection is used as a reference for areception interval, a possibility of erroneously detecting an authorizeddata frame as an unauthorized data frame is reduced even if anunauthorized node is connected to the buses and an unauthorized dataframe is transmitted, and the transmission of the unauthorized dataframe can be appropriately detected.

In addition, in the performing evaluation, if a relationship between thereception timing of the target data frame and the reception timing ofthe reference data frame complies with the certain rule, it may beevaluated that the target data frame is not unauthorized. If therelationship does not comply with the certain rule, it may be evaluatedthat the target data frame is unauthorized. As a result, it can bechecked through alternative evaluation whether a data frame subjected tomisuse detection is unauthorized. It is to be noted that whether a dataframe subjected to misuse detection can be determined on the basis of aresult of the evaluation or a combination of the result and other typesof evaluation.

In addition, the certain rule may specify an appropriate range of thereception interval. In the performing evaluation, if a differencebetween the reception timing of the target data frame and the receptiontiming of the reference data frame prior to the foregoing receptiontiming falls within the appropriate range, it may be evaluated that thecertain rule is complied with. As a result, evaluation can be performedsuch that it is determined that a target data frame is not unauthorizedif a reception intervals between data frames falls within a range ofallowable errors.

In addition, the misuse detection method may further include evaluating,as misuse detection for the target data frame, whether the target dataframe is unauthorized in accordance with an interval between thereception timing of the target data frame and a reception timing of thetarget data frame prior to the foregoing reception timing. The misusedetection in the evaluating may be performed prior to the misusedetection in the performing evaluation, and after it is evaluated in theevaluating that the target data frame is unauthorized, the misusedetection in the evaluating may be stopped and the misuse detection inthe performing evaluation may start. As a result, since a reference fora reception interval for misuse detection is switched when a state inwhich it is inappropriate to continue misuse detection based on areception interval between data frames subjected to the misuse detectionhas occurred, appropriate misuse detection can be performed.

In addition, in the evaluating, if the reception timing of the targetdata frame falls outside an appropriate time frame predetermined on thebasis of the reception timing of the target data frame prior to theforegoing reception timing, or if the reception timing of the targetdata frame falls within the appropriate time frame and the other targetdata is received at a timing within the appropriate time frame, it maybe evaluated as the misuse detection for the target data frame that thetarget data frame is unauthorized. As a result, a reference for areception interval for misuse detection is switched when a state inwhich it is inappropriate to continue misuse detection based on areception interval between data frames subjected to the misuse detectionhas occurred.

In addition, in the receiving, another reference data frame may bereceived transmitted through the buses, wherein the other reference dataframe may be a data frame having a third identifier different from thefirst identifier or the second identifier. The misuse detection methodmay further include performing misuse detection for the reference dataframe and subsequently performing, as misuse detection for the targetdata frame, evaluation in accordance with a reception timing of theother reference data frame and the reception timing of the target dataframe on the basis of a rule specifying a reception interval between theother reference data frame and the target data frame. If it is detectedin the performing misuse detection that the reference data frame isunauthorized, the misuse detection in the performing evaluation may bestopped and the misuse detection in the subsequently performing maystart. As a result, when misuse of a data frame that serves as areference for a reception interval for misuse detection has beendetected, a data frame that serves as the reference can be switched tocontinue appropriate misuse detection.

In addition, the misuse detection in the performing evaluation may startafter one of a plurality of identifiers different from the firstidentifier selected in accordance with a predetermined selectioncriterion is determined as the second identifier, and the misusedetection in the subsequently performing may start after one of aplurality of identifiers different from the first identifier or thesecond identifier selected in accordance with the predeterminedselection criterion is determined as the third identifier. As a result,if misuse of a data frame that serves as a reception interval for misusedetection is detected, the reference can be changed to an appropriatedata frame to continue misuse detection, insofar as a selectioncriterion is appropriately predetermined.

In addition, the misuse detection in the performing evaluation may beperformed after one of a plurality of identifiers different from thefirst identifier, the one of the plurality of identifiers being anidentifier of a data frame with which misuse has not yet been detected,is determined as the second identifier. As a result, misuse detectioncan be performed appropriately compared to when a data frame with whichmisuse has been detected is used as a reference for a reception intervalfor the misuse detection.

In addition, the misuse detection in the performing evaluation may beperformed after one of a plurality of identifiers different from thefirst identifier is determined as the second identifier in accordancewith a state of a vehicle on which the plurality of electronic controlunits are mounted. As a result, misuse detection can be appropriatelyperformed using a reference that suits the state of the vehicle as areference for a reception interval for the misuse detection.

In addition, in the performing evaluation, the evaluation whether thetarget data frame is unauthorized may be performed in accordance with areception timing of each of at least one data frame each having anidentifier different from the first identifier or the second identifierand the reference data frame and the reception timing of the target dataframe on the basis of a group of rules including the certain rulespecifying a reception interval between each of the at least one dataframe and the reference data frame and the target data frame, andwhether the target data frame is unauthorized may be determined on thebasis of a result of the evaluation. As a result, a determinationwhether a data frame is unauthorized can be comprehensively andaccurately made using results of evaluation based on rules relating to aplurality of reception intervals.

In addition, in the performing evaluation, the evaluation may beperformed by calculating a likelihood that the target data frame isunauthorized through a certain calculation based on a group of rulesincluding the certain rule specifying a reception interval between eachof at least one data frame each having an identifier different from thefirst identifier or the second identifier and the reference data frameand the target data frame, a reception timing of each of the at leastone data frame and the reference data frame, and the reception timing ofthe target data frame. As a result, a likelihood that a data frame isunauthorized can be obtained.

In addition, the misuse detection method may further include recording aresult of the evaluation performed in the performing evaluation in astorage medium. As a result, a process that utilizes a result ofevaluation relating to misuse detection for a data frame can beachieved.

In addition, a misuse detection electronic control unit according to anaspect of the present disclosure is a misuse detection electroniccontrol unit in a vehicle network system including a plurality ofelectronic control units that communicate with one another through busesin accordance with a CAN protocol. The misuse detection electroniccontrol unit includes a reception unit that receives a target data frameand a reference data frame which are transmitted through the buses,wherein the target data frame is a data frame having a first identifierand wherein the reference data frame is a data frame having a secondidentifier different from the first identifier, a rule holding unit thatholds rule information indicating a certain rule specifying a receptioninterval between the target data frame and the reference data frame anda detection unit that performs, as misuse detection for the target dataframe, evaluation in accordance with a reception timing of the referencedata frame and a reception timing of the target data frame on the basisof the certain rule. As a result, a possibility of erroneously detectingan authorized frame as an unauthorized frame is reduced even if anunauthorized node is connected to buses and an unauthorized frame istransmitted, and the transmission of the unauthorized frame can beappropriately detected.

In addition, a misuse detection system according to an aspect of thepresent disclosure is a misuse detection system for misuse detection ina vehicle network system including a plurality of electronic controlunits that communicate with one another through buses in accordance witha CAN protocol. The misuse detection system includes a reception unitthat receives a target data frame and a reference data frame transmittedthrough the buses, wherein the target data frame is a data frame havinga first identifier and wherein the reference data frame is a data framehaving a second identifier different from the first identifier, a ruleholding unit that holds rule information indicating a certain rulespecifying a reception interval between the target data frame and thereference data frame and a detection unit that performs, as misusedetection for the target data frame, evaluation in accordance with areception timing of the reference data frame and a reception timing ofthe target data frame on the basis of the certain rule. As a result,transmission of an unauthorized data frame can be appropriatelydetected.

It should be noted that these general or specific aspects may beimplemented as a system, a method, an integrated circuit, a computerprogram, a computer-readable recording medium such as a compact discread-only memory (CD-ROM), or any selective combination thereof.

Vehicle network systems according to embodiments will be describedhereinafter with reference to the drawings. The embodiments describedhereinafter are specific examples of the present disclosure. Values,components, the arrangement and connection modes of the components,steps, the order of the steps, and the like mentioned in the followingembodiments, therefore, are examples and do not limit the presentdisclosure. Among the components described in the following embodiments,ones not described in the independent claims can be arbitrarily added.The drawings are schematic diagrams and not necessarily exact.

FIRST EMBODIMENT

A misuse detection method used in a vehicle network system 10 with whicha plurality of ECUs communicate through buses will be describedhereinafter with reference to the drawings as an embodiment of thepresent disclosure.

The misuse detection method is a method for detecting an unauthorizedframe transmitted after an unauthorized node is connected to buses of aCAN and mainly implemented by a misuse detection ECU connected to thebuses. A misuse detection ECU 100 in the vehicle network system 10detects an unauthorized data frame on the basis of a reception intervalbetween data frames (messages) having two different identifiers (messageIDs). As a result, if an unauthorized data frame is transmitted, apossibility of erroneously detecting an authorized data frame having thesame identifier (message ID) as the unauthorized data frame as anunauthorized data frame is reduced.

1.1 Overall Configuration of Vehicle Network System 10

FIG. 1 is a diagram illustrating the overall configuration of thevehicle network system 10 according to the first embodiment.

The vehicle network system 10 is an example of a network communicationsystem that performs communication in accordance with a CAN protocol andis a network communication system in a vehicle on which various devicessuch as control devices, sensors, actuators, and user interface devicesare mounted. The vehicle network system 10 includes a plurality ofdevices that perform communication relating to frames through the busesand uses the misuse detection method. More specifically, as illustratedin FIG. 1, the vehicle network system 10 is configured by includingbuses 300 and various nodes connected to the buses 300 including themisuse detection ECU 100 and ECUs connected to the various devices, suchas an ECU (automatic parking ECU) 200 a, an ECU (power steering ECU) 200b, and an ECU (gear ECU) 200 c. It is to be noted that a number of ECUscan be included in the vehicle network system 10 in addition to themisuse detection ECU 100 and the ECUs 200 a, 200 b, and 200 c, but themisuse detection ECU 100 and the ECUs 200 a. 200 b, and 200 c will bemainly described hereinafter for the sake of convenience. An ECU, forexample, is a device including a digital circuit, an analog circuit, acommunication circuit, and the like such as a processor (microprocessor)and a memory. A memory is a read-only memory (ROM), a random-accessmemory (RAM), or the like and is capable of storing a control program(computer program) executed by the processor. When the processoroperates in accordance with the control program (computer program), forexample, the ECU achieves various functions thereof. It is to be notedthat the computer program is configured by combining a plurality ofcommand codes indicating instructions to the processor in order toachieve certain functions.

The automatic parking ECU 200 a, the power steering ECU 200 b, and thegear ECU 200 c are connected to the buses 300 and to a camera 210, ahandle (steering wheel) 220, and gears (speed change mechanism) 230,respectively. In addition, the automatic parking ECU 200 a is connectedto a touch panel 240 and receives an operation from a passenger. Theautomatic parking ECU 200 a periodically transmits data frames to thebuses 300. In addition, if a passenger operates the touch panel 240, theautomatic parking ECU 200 a enters an automatic parking mode andtransmits a signal specifying a steering angle of the handle 200 to thebuses 300 while obtaining information from the camera 210. The powersteering ECU 200 b receives a data frame on the buses 300 and, if thereis a handle steering instruction, turns the handle 200 by a specifiedangle. The gear ECU 200 c obtains a state of the gears 230 andperiodically transmits data frames indicating the state of the gears 230to the buses 300.

The misuse detection ECU 100 is a kind of ECU connected to the buses 300and has a function of performing a misuse detection process, by whichdata frames flowing through the buses (that is, data frames appearing onthe buses) are monitored and whether an unauthorized data frame (thatis, a data frame that does not comply with a predetermined rule) isflowing is determined.

In the vehicle network system 10, the ECUs communicate frames inaccordance with the CAN protocol. Frames according to the CAN protocolinclude a data frame, a remote frame, an overload frame, and an errorframe. The data frame will be mainly described hereinafter.

1.2 Data Frame Format

The data frame, which is one of the frames used in a network accordingto the CAN protocol, will be described hereinafter.

FIG. 2 is a diagram illustrating a format of the data frame specified inthe CAN protocol. The figure illustrates a data frame in a standard IDformat specified in the CAN protocol. The data frame is configured byfields of an start of frame (SOF), an ID field, an remote transmissionrequest (RTR), an identifier extension (IDE), a reserved bit “r”, a datalength code (DLC), a data field, a cyclic redundancy check (CRC)sequence, a CRC delimiter “DEL”, an acknowledgement (ACK) slot, an ACKdelimiter “DEL”, and an end of frame (EOF).

The SOF is configured by a 1-bit dominant. When the buses are idle, thedata frame is recessive. By making the data frame dominant using theSOF, start of transmission of the frame is notified.

The ID field is a field storing an ID (frame ID), which is a valueconfigured by 11 bits and indicating a type of data. The ID field isdesigned such that a frame having a smaller ID value has higherpriority, so that if a plurality of nodes simultaneously starttransmission, the communication can be mediated using the ID field.

The RTR is a value for distinguishing a data frame and a remote frame.In the data frame, the RTR is configured by a dominant 1 bit.

The IDE and the “r” are both configured by a dominant 1 bit.

The DLC is a value configured by 4 bits and indicating the length of thedata field. The 4 bits in the data frame storing a value of the DLC willalso be referred to as a “DLC field” herein.

The data field is a value configured by up to 64 bits and indicating thecontent of data to be transmitted. The length can be adjusted in stepsof 8 bits. Specifications of the data to be transmitted are notspecified in the CAN protocol but determined by the vehicle networksystem 10. The specifications, therefore, depend upon a vehicle model, amanufacturer (manufacturing maker), and the like.

The CRC sequence is configured by 15 bits. The CRC sequence is obtainedfrom values transmitted in the SOF, the ID field, a control field, andthe data field.

The CRC delimiter is a delimitation sign configured by a 1-bit recessiveand indicating an end of the CRC sequence. It is to be noted that theCRC sequence and the CRC delimiter will be collectively referred to as a“CRC field”.

The ACK slot is configured by 1 bit. A transmission node performstransmission with the ACK slot recessive. If a reception node cancorrectly receive a data frame up to the CRC sequence, the receptionnode performs transmission with the ACK slot dominant. Since a dominanttakes priority over a recessive, if the ACK slot is dominant after thetransmission, the transmission node can affirm that one of receptionnodes has successfully received the data frame.

The ACK delimiter is a delimitation sign configured by a 1-bit recessiveand indicating an end of the ACK.

The EOF is configured by 7 bits of recessives and indicates an end ofthe data frame.

1.3 Error Frame Format

FIG. 3 is a diagram illustrating a format of the error frame specifiedin the CAN protocol. The error frame is configured by an error flag(primary), an error flag (secondary), and an error delimiter.

The error flag (primary) is used for notifying other nodes of occurrenceof an error. A node that has detected an error successively transmits 6bits of dominants in order to notify other nodes of occurrence of theerror. Because the transmission violates a bit stuffing rule (6 bits ormore of the same value must not be successively transmitted) of the CANprotocol, the other nodes are caused to transmit error frames(secondary).

The error flag (secondary) is configured by 6 consecutive bits ofdominants used for notifying other nodes of occurrence of an error. Allnodes that have received an error flag (primary) and detected aviolation of the bit stuffing rule transmit an error flag (secondary).

The error delimiter “DEL” is 8 consecutive bits of recessives andindicates an end of the error frame.

1.4 Configuration of Misuse Detection ECU 100

FIG. 4 is a configuration diagram of the misuse detection ECU 100. Themisuse detection ECU 100 is configured by including a transceiversection 130, a controller section 140, and a microcontroller section150.

The transceiver section 130 is an electronic circuit such as acommunication circuit. The transceiver section 130 converts a frametransmitted from the controller section 140 into an electrical signalthat can be transmitted to the buses 300 and transmits the electricalsignal. In addition, the transceiver section 130 receives an electricalsignal appearing on the buses 300 in order to transmit the content of areceived frame to the controller section 140. The transceiver section130 functions as a reception unit that receives a data frame transmittedthrough the buses 300.

The controller section 140 is a semiconductor integrated circuit thatincludes a digital circuit and a storage medium such as a memory andthat communicates signals with the microcontroller section 150 and thetransceiver section 130. The controller section 140 includes a protocolprocessing portion 141.

The protocol processing portion 141 communicates with the transceiversection 130 and performs processing according to a protocol (CANprotocol or the like). If detecting an error in a frame that is beingreceived, for example, the protocol processing portion 141 instructs thetransceiver section 130 to transmit an error frame (that is, atransmission request) in order to cause the transceiver section 130 totransmit an error frame. After reception of a data frame is completed,the protocol processing portion 141 notifies the microcontroller section150 of the completion of the reception of the data frame. In response toa data frame transmission request from the microcontroller section 150,the protocol processing portion 141 instructs the transceiver section130 to transmit a data frame in accordance with the protocol. Inaddition, the protocol processing portion 141 gives the microcontrollersection 150 the content (an ID, a DLC, data, and the like) of a dataframe appearing on the buses 300 obtained through the transceiversection 130.

The microcontroller section 150 is a semiconductor integrated circuitthat includes a processor (microprocessor) which executes a program anda memory and that communicates signals with the controller section 140.The microcontroller section 150 includes a controller communicationportion 151, a misuse detection process portion 152, a frame generationportion 153, a rule holding portion 154, a timer holding portion 155,and a reception timing holding portion 156 as components achieved by theprocessor that executes a program, the memory, and the like.

The controller communication portion 151 transmits a data frame receivedfrom the controller section 140 to the misuse detection process portion152. The controller communication portion 151 transmits a data frametransmitted from the frame generation portion 153 to the controllersection 140 and issues a data frame transmission request.

The misuse detection process portion 152 functions as a detectionportion that performs a misuse detection process on a data frametransmitted from the controller communication portion 151. The misusedetection process is a process for evaluating misuse of a data frametransmitted through the buses 300, that is, a data frame appearing onthe buses 300. The evaluation of the misuse of a data frame isspecifically evaluation whether a data frame transmitted through thebuses 300, that is, a data frame appearing on the buses 300, isunauthorized, that is, a determination whether the data frame complieswith the predetermined rule. In the misuse detection process, whether acurrently received data frame is unauthorized is determined by referringto rule information indicating a misuse detection rule stored in therule holding portion 154, information regarding a current timing storedin the timer holding portion 155, and reception timing informationindicating a past reception timing of a data frame stored in thereception timing holding portion 156. Although a rule relating to areception interval will be mainly described hereinafter as the misusedetection rule for the sake of convenience of description, the misusedetection rule can include a rule other than that relating to areception interval. If an ID (message ID) of a data frame that is beingreceived is specified as a target of the misuse detection rule in therule information stored in the rule holding portion 154, the misusedetection process portion 152 checks, as the misuse detection process,whether its reception timing falls within a range determined by areception interval from a reception timing of another data frame thatserves as a reference for the reception interval and margins. It is tobe noted that if the reception timing of the received data frame fallswithin the range based on the reception interval and the marginsindicated by the rule information, the received data frame isauthorized, and if not, the received data frame is unauthorized. Thatis, if a relationship between reception timings of data frames complieswith the misuse detection rule relating to the reception interval andthe margins indicated by the rule information, the data frame isauthorized, and if not, the data frame is unauthorized. If it isdetermined (judged) that a received data frame is unauthorized, themisuse detection process portion 152 can transmit information regardingthe unauthorized data frame to the frame generation portion 153 in orderto notify the ECUs of occurrence of misuse (the transmission of theunauthorized data frame). If detecting an unauthorized data frame, themisuse detection process portion 152 may count and record an accumulatednumber of times of detection of misuse for each of IDs of data framesand use the record for a comprehensive determination of misuse for eachof the IDs of data frames. Alternatively, the misuse detection processportion 152 may record log information regarding unauthorized dataframes (e.g., IDs and other pieces of information regarding theunauthorized data frames, reception times, and the like) in a recordingmedium (storage medium) or the like or perform control for reportingmisuse (display, transmission of information to a server apparatuslocated outside the vehicle, or the like).

If receiving information regarding a data frame determined by the misusedetection process portion 152 to be unauthorized, for example, the framegeneration portion 153 transmits, to the controller communicationportion 151, a data frame transmission request including the informationregarding the unauthorized data frame.

The rule holding portion 154 holds the rule information (refer to FIG.5) indicating the misuse detection rule, which is a rule about acommunication interval (reception interval) between data frames to bereferred to by the misuse detection process portion 152.

The timer holding portion 155 holds the information indicating thecurrent timing (present time) measured on the basis of a timingmechanism such as a counter and is referred to by the misuse detectionprocess portion 152 in order to obtain a timing at which a data framehas been received. The current timing may be measured from any point oftime and, for example, can be measured while determining a time at whichpower is supplied to the misuse detection ECU 100 as zero.

The reception timing holding portion 156 holds the reception timinginformation obtained by recording, for each ID, a reception timing of adata frame received in the past. The reception timing information (referto FIG. 6) is referred to by the misuse detection process portion 152and used in a determination whether a currently received data frame isunauthorized.

1.5 Misuse Detection Rule

FIG. 5 is a diagram illustrating an example of the rule informationindicating the misuse detection rule held by the rule holding portion154. In the example illustrated in the figure, a reception intervalrelating to data frames whose IDs (message IDs) are 0×100 is indicated.The misuse detection ECU 100 performs misuse detection on the basis of areception interval between a data frame not subjected to a check (misusedetection) (referred to as a “reference data frame”) and a data framesubjected to the misuse detection (referred to as a “target dataframe”). According to the rule information in the example illustrated inthe figure, the misuse detection ECU 100 performs misuse detection on atarget data frame whose ID is 0×100 on the basis of a reception intervalbetween a reference data frame whose ID is 0×200 and the target dataframe whose ID is 0×100, If a reception timing of the target data framewhose ID is 0×100 is 25 ms, which is the reception interval, after areception timing of the reference data frame (the data frame whose ID is0×200 in this example), the target data frame whose ID is 0×100 isauthorized.

Margins of ±3 ms are provided for the reception interval of 25 ms inconsideration of a fluctuation in the reception interval caused bymediation (retransmission control) in the case of a collision betweendata frames in the buses 300. It is to be noted that a oneretransmission interval when a collision occurs between data frames inthe buses 300 is, for example, shorter than 1 ms. In the exampleillustrated in FIG. 5, if the reception interval between the referencedata frame whose ID is 0×200 and the target data frame whose ID is 0×100falls within a range of 22 ms to 28 ms, the target data frame isdetermined to be authorized, and if not, the target data frame isdetermined to be unauthorized.

Although an example of the misuse detection rule relating only to thedata frame whose ID is 0×100 has been described in this example, amisuse detection rule for a plurality of IDs may be predetermined,instead. In addition, although an example in which the rule informationindicates a misuse detection rule specifying a reception intervalrelating to a reference data frame of a single ID (0×200) has beendescribed, the number of IDs of data frames that serve as reference dataframes is not limited to one, but may be two, or may be three or more.In addition, when the rule information indicates a rule relating to IDsand reception intervals of a plurality of reference data frames, themisuse detection process portion 152 can use an arbitrary number ofrules for misuse detection. For example, when there are five rulesrelating to reception intervals and three (rules specifying receptionintervals in which data frames having three different IDs are used asreference data frames) of the five rules have been used for misusedetection, it may be comprehensively determined that there has beenmisuse if one of the three rules is not complied with, or it may becomprehensively determined that there has not been misuse if one of thethree rules is complied with. Alternatively, by a majority rule, if dataframes are determined to be unauthorized on the basis of two or more ofthe three rules used for the misuse detection (if two or more rules arenot complied with), it may be comprehensively determined that there hasbeen misuse, and if data frames are determined to be authorized on thebasis of two or more rules (if two or more rules are complied with), itmay be comprehensively determined that there has not been misuse. Inaddition, although a reception interval between target data frames whoseIDs are 0×100 is not included in the misuse detection rule in theexample illustrated in FIG. 5, the reception interval (e.g., 50 ms)between data frames whose Ds are 0×100, for example, may be included inthe misuse detection rule. In addition, the content of the rule may beencrypted and held.

1.6 Reception Timing Information

FIG. 6 is a diagram illustrating an example of the reception timinginformation stored in the reception timing holding portion 156. In thereception timing information, a reception timing of a data framereceived by the misuse detection ECU 100 in the past is recorded foreach ID by referring to the current timing held by the timer holdingportion 155. In the example illustrated in FIG. 6, it is indicated thata timing at which a data frame whose ID (message ID) is 0×100 has beenpreviously received is 201 ms and a timing at which a data frame whoseID is 0×200 has been previously received is 176 ms.

1.7 Configuration of Automatic Parking ECU 200 a

FIG. 7 is a configuration diagram of the ECU (automatic parking ECU) 200a. The ECU 200 a includes a transceiver section 130, a controllersection 140, and a microcontroller section 250.

The transceiver section 130 and the controller section 140 are the sameas the transceiver section 130 and the controller section 140 of themisuse detection ECU 100 (refer to FIG. 4), and description thereof isomitted.

The microcontroller section 250 is a semiconductor integrated circuitthat includes a processor which executes a program and a memory and thatcommunicates signals with the controller section 140. Themicrocontroller section 250 includes a controller communication portion151, a frame processing portion 252, a frame generation portion 253, andan external device input/output portion 254 as components achieved bythe processor that executes a program, the memory, and the like.

The controller communication portion 151 is the same as the controllercommunication portion 151 in the misuse detection ECU 100 (refer to FIG.4). The controller communication portion 151 in the ECU 200 a, however,transmits a data frame received from the controller section 140 to theframe processing portion 252. The controller communication portion 151transmits a data frame transmitted from the frame generation portion 253to the controller section 140 to issue a data frame transmissionrequest.

The frame processing portion 252 processes a data frame transmitted fromthe controller communication portion 151 and transmits a result to theexternal device input/output portion 254.

The frame generation portion 253 generates a data frame (refer to FIGS.8A and 8B) on the basis of values transmitted from the external deviceinput/output portion 254 and transmits the data frame to the controllercommunication portion 151.

The external device input/output portion 254 communicates with anexternal device connected to the ECU 200 a. That is, the external deviceinput/output portion 254 receives an instruction to enter the automaticparking mode in accordance with an operation performed using the touchpanel 240, obtains information indicating surroundings of the vehiclewhose image has been captured by the camera 210, and transmits theinformation to the frame generation portion 253.

The power steering ECU 200 b and the gear ECU 200 c, too, have the sameconfiguration as the automatic parking ECU 200 a. An external deviceinput/output portion 254 in the power steering ECU 200 b, however,transmits, to the handle 220 connected to the power steering ECU 200 b,a control signal (a signal used for steering) based on valuestransmitted from the frame processing portion 252. An external deviceinput/output portion 254 in the gear ECU 200 c obtains the state of thegears 230 and notifies the frame generation portion 253 of the state ofthe gears 230.

1.8 Examples of Data Frames

FIGS. 8A and 8B are diagrams illustrating examples of IDs (message IDs)and data fields (data) of data frames to be transmitted.

FIG. 8A illustrates an example of a data frame transmitted by theautomatic parking ECU 200 a, and FIG. 8B illustrates an example of adata frame transmitted by the gear ECU 200 c.

A message ID of the data frame transmitted by the automatic parking ECU200 a is “0×000”, and a DLC is “4” (four bytes). A first byte of a datafield indicates a mode and is 1 in the case of the automatic parkingmode. When the mode is not the automatic parking mode, values of asecond byte and later in the data field are invalid. The second byte ofthe data field indicates which way the handle 220 is to be turned in theautomatic parking mode. If the value is “0”, the handle 220 is turnedright, and if the value is “1”, the handle 220 is turned left. Two bytesof third and fourth bytes in the data field collectively indicate anangle by which the handle 220 is to be turned. In the exampleillustrated in FIG. 8A, the automatic parking mode is established, andthe handle 220 is to be turned right by 256 (0×100) degrees.

A message ID of the data frame transmitted by the gear ECU 200 c is“0×200”, and a DLC is “1” (one byte). A data field includes a valueindicating the state of the gears 230. The value is “0” when the gears230 are in a neutral state, “1” when the gears 230 are in a reversestate, and “2” when the gears 230 are in a drive state. In the exampleillustrated in FIG. 8B, it is indicated that the gears 230 are in thereverse state.

1.9 Example of Misuse Detection Operation Performed by Misuse DetectionECU 100 on Data Frames

FIG. 9 is a diagram illustrating an example in which the misusedetection ECU 100 receives data frames sequentially appearing on thebuses 300 and performs misuse detection. In FIG. 9, a situation isillustrated in which data frames F2, F5, and F8 whose IDs are 0×100periodically transmitted by the automatic parking ECU 200 a and dataframes F1, F4, and F7 whose IDs are 0×200 periodically transmitted bythe gear ECU 200 c sequentially appear on the buses 300. In addition, inFIG. 9, an attacker (unauthorized ECU) that can access the buses 300periodically transmits unauthorized data frames F3, F6, and F9 whose IDsare 0×100 to the buses 300 in order to improperly control the handle220. In this example, the misuse detection ECU 100 perform evaluationrelating to misuse on the data frames whose IDs are 0×100 (morespecifically, determinations whether the data frames are unauthorized)as misuse detection (check), Although not illustrated in FIG. 9, themisuse detection ECU 100 can perform misuse detection (evaluationrelating to misuse) on the data frames whose IDs are not 0×100.

The misuse detection ECU 100 holds a timing at which the data frame F1,whose ID is 0×200, has been received as reception timing information.Next, the misuse detection ECU 100 checks, on the basis of the misusedetection rule indicated by the rule information held by the ruleholding portion 154, whether a reception timing of the data frame F2,whose ID is 0×100, falls within a range T1, which is 22 ms to 28 msafter the reception timing (the timing indicated by the reception timinginformation) of the data frame F1, whose ID is 0×200. The range T1indicates a time frame based on the reception timing of the data frameF1 that extends around the reception interval 25 ms indicated by therule information (refer to FIG. 5) by margins of 3 ms. Because the dataframe F2, whose ID is 0×100, transmitted by the automatic parking ECU200 a has been received at a timing within the range T1, the data frameF2 is determined as an authorized data frame. In addition, because it isdetermined, as a result of a determination as to the range T1 (that is,a determination whether the data frame is unauthorized), that the dataframe F3, whose ID is 0×100 and which is transmitted by the attacker(unauthorized ECU), received next has not been received within the rangeT1, the data frame F3 is determined to be unauthorized.

In addition, similarly, the misuse detection ECU 100 holds a timing atwhich the data frame F4, whose ID is 0×200, has been received and checkswhether a reception timing of the data frame F5, whose ID is 0×100,falls within a range T2, which is 22 ms to 28 ms after the receptiontiming of the data frame F4. Because the reception timing of the dataframe F5 falls within the range T2, the misuse detection ECU 100determines that the data frame F5 is authorized, and because the dataframe F6, whose ID is 0×100, received next has not been received withinthe range T2, the misuse detection ECU 100 determines that the dataframe F6 is unauthorized.

The misuse detection ECU 100 then determines, similarly, that the dataframe F8, whose ID is 0×100, received within a range T3 is authorizedand that the data frame F9, whose ID is 0×100, that has not beenreceived within the range T3 is unauthorized, on the basis of areception interval from a reception timing of the data frame F7, whoseID is 0×200.

1.10 Misuse Detection Process Performed by Misuse Detection ECU 100

A process performed by the misuse detection ECU 100 as the misusedetection process when a data frame is received will be described withreference to a flowchart of FIG. 10.

The misuse detection ECU 100 receives a data frame from the buses 300(step S1101).

The misuse detection ECU 100 checks, on the basis of the ruleinformation held by the rule holding portion 154, whether an ID of thereceived data frame is 0×100 (step S1102), and if the ID of the receiveddata frame is not 0×100, checks whether the ID of the received dataframe is 0×200 (step S1103).

If it is checked in step S1103 that the ID is 0×200, the misusedetection ECU 100 refers to the timer holding portion 155 to obtain thecurrent timing, updates the reception timing information indicating thereception timing of a data frame relating to the ID of 0×200 stored inthe reception timing holding portion 156 such that the reception timinginformation indicates the current timing (step S1104), and ends theprocess.

If it is checked in step S1103 that the ID is not 0×200, the misusedetection ECU 100 ends the process corresponding to the reception of onedata frame.

If the ID of the data frame received in step S1101 is 0×100 (stepS1102), the misuse detection ECU 100 determines whether its receptiontiming falls within a range 22 ms to 28 ms after reception of a dataframe whose ID is 0×200 (step S1105). That is, the misuse detection ECU100 checks whether the current timing obtained by referring to the timerholding portion 155 falls within a range extending from a value obtainedby subtracting a margin (3 ms) from a timing obtained by adding areception timing of the data frame (reference data frame) whose ID is0×200 indicated by the reception timing information stored in thereception timing holding portion 156 and the reception interval (25 ms)from the data frame whose ID is 0×200 indicated by the rule informationto a value obtained by adding a margin to the timing. If the receptiontiming of the data frame (target data frame) whose ID is 0×100 does notfall within the range based on the reception timing of the referencedata frame, the misuse detection ECU 100 determines that the target dataframe is unauthorized, and ends the process corresponding to thereception of one data frame (step S1106).

If, in step S1105, the reception timing of the target data frame whoseID is 0×100 falls within the range determined by the specified receptioninterval and the margins on the basis of the reception timing of thereference data frame, the misuse detection ECU 100 determines that thetarget data frame is authorized.

That is, if the target data frame complies with the misuse detectionrule specifying an appropriate range of a reception interval, the misusedetection ECU 100 determines that the target data frame is authorized,and if not, the misuse detection ECU 100 determines that the target dataframe is unauthorized. The misuse detection ECU 100 then refers to thetimer holding portion 155, updates the reception timing informationindicating the reception timing of a data frame whose ID is 0×100 storedin the reception timing holding portion 156 such that the receptiontiming information indicates the current timing (step S1107), and endsthe process corresponding to the reception of one data frame.

Although an example in which misuse detection is performed on a dataframe whose ID is 0×100 is mainly illustrated in FIG. 10, the misusedetection ECU 100 can perform misuse detection on a data frame havinganother ID as the misuse detection process. The reception timinginformation indicating the reception timing of a data frame whose ID is0×100 updated in step S1107, for example, can be used as a reference formisuse detection other than that in the example illustrated in FIG. 10(e.g., a check relating to a reception interval between data frameswhose IDs are 0×100 or a check of data frames having other IDs).

The misuse detection process performed by the misuse detection ECU 100thus includes a reception step (step S1101) of receiving a data frametransmitted through the buses 300. The misuse detection process alsoincludes a detection step (e.g., steps S1102, S1105, S1106, and thelike) of performing, as misuse detection for a target data frame, whichis a data frame having a first identifier (e.g., the ID of 0×100),evaluation (a determination whether the target data frame isunauthorized or the like) in accordance with a reception timing of areference data frame, which is a data frame having a second identifier(e.g., the ID of 0×200) different from the first identifier, and areception timing of the target data frame on the basis of a certain rule(that is, the misuse detection rule indicated by the rule information)specifying a reception interval between the reference data frame and thetarget data frame.

1.11 Effects Produced by First Embodiment

In the vehicle network system 10 according to the first embodiment, themisuse detection ECU 100 performs evaluation relating to misuse of dataframe (a determination whether a data frame is unauthorized or the like)on the basis of a reception interval between a data frame subjected tothe evaluation and a data frame having an ID (message ID) different fromthe foregoing data frame.

As a result, transmission of an unauthorized data frame performed by anattacker (an unauthorized ECU that accesses the buses 300 or the like)can be detected.

When evaluation relating to misuse of a data frame is performed on thebasis of reception intervals between authorized data frames whose IDsare 0×100 periodically transmitted by the automatic parking ECU 200 a(reception intervals between data frames having the same ID), forexample, an authorized data frame can be determined to be unauthorizedas a result of transmission of an unauthorized data frame whose ID is0×100 performed by an attacker. This is because, for example, if aplurality of data frames are received in a time frame (a range based onthe reception interval) in which data frames are determined to beauthorized and one of the plurality of data frames is an unauthorizeddata frame transmitted by an attacker, the data frame transmitted by theattacker can serve as a reference for evaluation based on a nextreception interval.

On the other hand, because, in the vehicle network system 10, evaluationrelating to misuse of a data frame whose ID is 0×100 is performed on thebasis of a reception interval from a data frame (reference data frame)whose ID is 0×200, a possibility of determining an authorized data frameto be unauthorized is reduced. For example, it is effective to use adata frame unlikely to be a target of a malicious attack as a referencedata frame that serves as a reference for a reception interval. Inaddition, when a plurality of misuse detection rules are provided andcomprehensive evaluation (a determination whether data frames areunauthorized or the like) is performed on the basis of receptionintervals between a plurality of reference data frames and target dataframes in order to perform evaluation relating to misuse of target dataframes having a certain ID, the evaluation relating to misuse of thetarget data frames can be performed more accurately.

SECOND EMBODIMENT

A vehicle network system 11 obtained by partially modifying the vehiclenetwork system 10 described in the first embodiment will be describedhereinafter.

The vehicle network system 11 according to the present embodiment uses amisuse detection method in which a data frame that serves as a referencefor a reception interval for a data frame subjected to misuse detectionis switched. First, a determination whether a data frame is unauthorizedis made on the basis of a reception interval between data frames havingthe same ID, and if it is determined that the data frame isunauthorized, another determination whether the data frame isunauthorized is made on the basis of a reception interval based on adata frame having another ID with which misuse has not been detected.

2.1 Overall Configuration of Vehicle Network System 11

FIG. 11 is a diagram illustrating the overall configuration of thevehicle network system 11 according to the present embodiment.

As illustrated in FIG. 11, the vehicle network system 11 is configuredby including buses 300 and various nodes connected to the buses 300including a misuse detection ECU 2100 and ECUs connected to the variousdevices, such as an ECU (automatic parking ECU) 200 a, an ECU (powersteering ECU) 200 b, an ECU (gear ECU) 200 c, and an ECU (vehicle speedECU) 2200 d. In the present embodiment, components having the samefunctions as in the first embodiment are given the same referencenumerals, and description thereof is omitted. In addition, the vehiclenetwork system 11 is the same as the vehicle network system 10 unlessotherwise specified in the present embodiment.

The vehicle speed ECU 2200 d is connected to the buses 300 and to avehicle speed sensor 2250. The vehicle speed ECU 2200 d has the sameconfiguration as the automatic parking ECU 200 a (refer to FIG. 7). Anexternal device input/output portion 254 of the vehicle speed ECU 2200d, however, instructs, on the basis of a signal transmitted from thevehicle speed sensor 2250, a frame generation portion 253 to generate adata frame indicating a current speed of the vehicle. As a result, thevehicle speed ECU 2200 d periodically transmits data frames indicatingthe current speed of the vehicle to the buses 300.

The misuse detection ECU 2100 is a kind of ECU connected to the buses300 and has a function of performing a misuse detection process in whichdata frames flowing through the buses 300 are monitored and whether anunauthorized frame is flowing is determined.

2.2 Configuration of Misuse Detection ECU 2100

FIG. 12 is a configuration diagram of the misuse detection ECU 2100. Themisuse detection ECU 2100 is configured by including a transceiversection 130, a controller section 140, and a microcontroller section2150. Components having the same functions as in the first embodimentare given the same reference numerals, and description thereof isomitted.

The microcontroller section 2150 is a semiconductor integrated circuitthat includes a processor which executes a program and a memory and thatcommunicates signals with the controller section 140. Themicrocontroller section 2150 includes a controller communication portion151, a frame generation portion 153, a misuse detection process portion2152, a rule holding portion 2154, a timer holding portion 155, and areception state holding portion 2156 as components achieved by theprocessor that executes a program, the memory, and the like.

The controller communication portion 151 transmits a data frame receivedfrom the controller section 140 to the misuse detection process portion2152.

The misuse detection process portion 2152 performs the misuse detectionprocess on a data frame transmitted from the controller communicationportion 151. The misuse detection process portion 2152 determines, inthe misuse detection process, whether a currently received data frame isunauthorized by referring to rule information indicating a misusedetection rule stored in the rule holding portion 2154, informationregarding a current timing stored in the timer holding portion 155, andreception state information indicating past reception states of dataframes and the like stored in the reception state holding portion 2156.

If an ID (message ID) of a data frame that is being received isspecified as a target of the misuse detection rule in the ruleinformation stored in the rule holding portion 154, the misuse detectionprocess portion 2152 checks, as the misuse detection process, whetherits reception timing falls within a range determined by a receptioninterval from a reception timing of another data frame that serves as areference for the reception interval and margins. If the receptiontiming of the received data frame falls within the range based on thereception interval and the margins indicated by the rule information,the received data frame is authorized, and if not, the received dataframe is unauthorized. The range is an appropriate time frame relatingto reception and will be referred to as a “reception appropriate timeframe”. It is to be noted that if it is determined that a received dataframe is unauthorized, the misuse detection process portion 2152 cantransmit information regarding the unauthorized data frame to the framegeneration portion 153 in order to notify the ECUs of occurrence ofmisuse. If detecting an unauthorized data frame, the misuse detectionprocess portion 2152 may count and record an accumulated number of timesof detection of misuse for each of IDs of data frames and use the recordfor a comprehensive determination of misuse for each of the IDs of dataframes. Alternatively, the misuse detection process portion 2152 mayrecord log information regarding unauthorized data frames (e.g., IDs andother pieces of information regarding the unauthorized data frames,reception times, and the like) in a recording medium (storage medium) orperform control for reporting misuse (display, transmission ofinformation to a server apparatus located outside the vehicle, or thelike).

The rule holding portion 2154 holds the rule information (refer to FIG.13) indicating the misuse detection rule, which is a rule about acommunication interval (reception interval) between data frames to bereferred to by the misuse detection process portion 2152. The misusedetection process portion 2152 identifies a reception appropriate timeframe on the basis of the misuse detection rule and determines whether adata frame subjected to misuse detection is unauthorized on the basis ofwhether the data frame falls within the reception appropriate timeframe. The misuse detection process portion 2152 identifies thereception appropriate time frame by referring to the reception stateinformation stored in the reception state holding portion 2156.

The reception state holding portion 2156 holds the reception stateinformation (refer to FIG. 14). That is, the reception state holdingportion 2156 holds a reception timing of a data frame received in thepast for each of the IDs of data frames. In addition, for the misusedetection process, the reception state holding portion 2156 refers tothe timer holding portion 155 to obtain the current timing for a timingat which a data frame (a data frame received in a reception appropriatetime frame) that satisfies the misuse detection rule relating to areception interval stored in the rule holding portion 2154 has beenreceived and temporarily holds the timing as a next reception timingcandidate. In addition, the reception state holding portion 2156 holds amisuse occurrence state indicating whether misuse has occurred for eachof the IDs of data frames. If a next reception timing candidate is setto a state in which there is no candidate each time an end of areception appropriate time frame comes, and if a plurality of dataframes are received in a reception appropriate time frame for which atiming value has already been held as a next reception timing candidate,for example, it can be determined that misuse has occurred, and themisuse occurrence state can be updated. In addition, the reception stateholding portion 2156 holds information regarding a previous receptioninterval from a reference data frame for each of IDs of reference dataframes. The reception state information held by the reception stateholding portion 2156 is referred to or updated by the misuse detectionprocess portion 2152 and used in a determination whether a currentlyreceived data frame is unauthorized.

2.3 Misuse Detection Rule

FIG. 13 is a diagram illustrating an example of the rule informationindicating the misuse detection rule held by the rule holding portion2154. In the example illustrated in the figure, reception intervals andmargins specified for combinations of data frames each having one of aplurality of IDs are illustrated whereas the rule informationillustrated in FIG. 5 in the first embodiment indicates only a singlereception interval.

The rule information illustrated in FIG. 13 indicates that, for example,a reception interval between a data frame whose ID is 0×100 and anotherdata frame whose ID is 0×100 is 50 ms, that is, a reception intervalbetween data frames having the same ID is 50 ms. In the case of dataframes whose IDs are 0×100, a reception appropriate time frame extendsfrom 47 ms, which is obtained by adding the reception interval (50 ms)to a reception timing of a previous data frame and subtracting a valueof a margin, to 53 ms, which is obtained by adding the value of themargin. If a data frame is received in the reception appropriate timeframe, the received data frame is basically determined to be authorized.If a plurality of data frames are received in the reception appropriatetime frame, however, it is determined that an unauthorized data framehas been transmitted.

In addition, the rule information illustrated in FIG. 13 indicates thatwhen data frames whose IDs are 0×100 are subjected to misuse detection(target data frames), a reception interval taken until a target dataframe is received after a reference data frame, which is a data framewhose ID is 0×200, is received is 25 ms. Similarly, a receptionappropriate time frame for a target data frame whose ID is 0×100 is 22ms to 28 ms after a reference data frame, whose ID is 0×200, isreceived.

In addition, in the rule information illustrated in FIG. 13, “+2”indicates that when data frames whose IDs are 0×100 are subjected tomisuse detection (target data frames), a reception interval taken untila target data frame is received after a reference data frame, which is adata frame whose ID is 0×300, is received increases by 2 ms from aprevious reception interval. That is, the reception interval changes ineach reception operation, and, in this example, a result obtained byadding 2 ms to a previous reception interval is determined as a currentreception interval. If an interval taken until a data frame whose ID is0×100 is received after a data frame whose ID is 0×300 is received is 10ms, for example, a reception appropriate time frame for a next dataframe whose ID is 0×100 is calculated as 9 ms to 15 ms, which isobtained by including margins of ±3 ms in 12 ms, which is obtained byadding 2 ms to 10 ms, after a reception timing of a data frame whose IDis 0×300. If the obtained range of the reception interval of 9 ms to 15ms becomes smaller than 0 or larger than an interval specified for tworeference data frames (48 ms in the case of data frames whose IDs are0×300), the range of the reception interval is normalized in such a wayas to fall within a range of 0 to the specified reception interval. As aresult of the normalization, the range of the reception interval isadjusted in such a way as to serve as a reception interval for areference data frame received immediately before a data frame whose IDis 0×100. If a reception interval is to be checked with a data framewhose ID is 0×300 determined as a reference data frame in order toperform misuse detection on a data frame whose ID is 0×100, and if aprevious reception interval is 47 ms, for example, a current receptioninterval is 49 ms, which is obtained by adding 2 ms to 47 ms. Thisvalue, however, undesirably exceeds 48 ms, which is an interval betweendata frames whose IDs are 0×300. The current reception interval,therefore, is 1 ms, which is obtained by subtracting 48 from 49. Sincethe margins of ±3 are allowed, a resultant reception appropriate timeframe is 0 to 4 ms and 46 ms to 48 ms after a reception timing of a dataframe of 0×300.

The rule information similarly specifies reception intervals and marginsused for misuse detection at a time when data frames whose IDs are 0×200or data frames whose IDs are 0×300 are a target of the misuse detection.

2.4 Reception State Information

FIG. 14 is a diagram illustrating an example of the reception stateinformation stored in the reception state holding portion 2156. In thereception state information, a reception timing of a data frame receivedby the misuse detection ECU 2100 in the past and the like are recordedfor each of the IDs of data frames.

The example illustrated in FIG. 14 indicates that a previous receptiontiming of a data frame whose ID is 0×100 is 151 ms, a next receptiontiming candidate is 201 ms, and misuse has occurred because, forexample, a plurality of data frames have been received in a receptionappropriate time frame (that is, the misuse occurrence state is“misused”). In addition, the example illustrated in FIG. 14 indicatesthat, as previous reception intervals, a reception interval between dataframes whose IDs are 0×100 has been 51 ms, a reception interval betweena data frame whose ID is 0×200 and a data frame whose ID is 0×100 hasbeen 25 ms, and a reception interval between a data frame whose ID is0×300 and a data frame whose ID is 0×100 has been 10 ms.

Similarly, reception timings, next reception timing candidates, misuseoccurrence states, and previous reception intervals are held for dataframes whose IDs are 0×200 and data frames whose IDs are 0×300. When thenext reception timing candidate is “none”, a data frame having anapplicable ID has not yet been received in a reception appropriate timeframe. In addition, after a reception appropriate time frame ends, themisuse detection process portion 2152 updates a reception timing using avalue of the next reception timing candidate in the reception stateinformation and then updates the next reception timing candidate to“none”.

2.5 Example of Data Frame

FIG. 15 is a diagram illustrating an example of an ID (message ID) and adata field (data) of a data frame transmitted by the vehicle speed ECU2200 d.

As illustrated in the figure, the message ID of the data frametransmitted by the vehicle speed ECU 2200 d is “0×300”, and a DLC is “1”(one byte). The data field includes a value indicating vehicle speed,and the example illustrated in FIG. 15 indicates that the vehicle speedis 16 (0×10) km/h.

2.6 Example of Misuse Detection Operation Performed by Misuse DetectionECU 2100 on Data Frames

FIG. 16 is a diagram illustrating an example in which the misusedetection ECU 2100 receives data frames sequentially appearing on thebuses 300 and performs misuse detection.

In FIG. 16, a situation is illustrated in which data frames F11, F13,F16, and F19 whose IDs are 0×100 periodically transmitted by theautomatic parking ECU 200 a and data frames F12, F15, and F18 whose IDsare 0×200 periodically transmitted by the gear ECU 200 c sequentiallyappear on the buses 300. In addition, in FIG. 16, an attacker(unauthorized ECU) that can access the buses 300 periodically transmitsunauthorized data frames F14, F17, and F20 whose IDs are 0×100 to thebuses 300 in order to improperly control the handle 220. In thisexample, the misuse detection ECU 2100 performs evaluation relating tomisuse on the data frames whose IDs are 0×100 (more specifically,determinations whether the data frames are unauthorized) as misusedetection (check). FIG. 16 illustrates an example in which, whenperforming evaluation relating to misuse on the data frames whose IDsare 0×100, the misuse detection ECU 2100 switches, in accordance with acondition of occurrence of misuse (misuse occurrence state), a dataframe that serves as a reference for a reception interval to a dataframe having an ID with which misuse has not occurred. Although notillustrated in FIG. 16, the misuse detection ECU 2100 can perform misusedetection (evaluation relating to misuse) on the data frames whose IDsare not 0×100. It is assumed that, in the reception state informationheld by the reception state holding portion 2156, the misuse occurrencestate corresponding to each ID is “none” at a beginning.

First, when misuse has not occurred (that is, when the misuse occurrencestate of each ID is “none” in the reception state information), themisuse detection ECU 2100 detects misuse of the data frames whose IDsare 0×100, which are subjected to the misuse detection, on the basis ofa reception interval based on a reception timing of a data frame havingthe same ID as the targets (0×100). It is to be noted that, in thisexample, the order of selection of an ID of a data frame that serves asa reference data frame is 0×100, 0×200, and 0×300.

The misuse detection ECU 2100 holds a timing at which the data frameF11, whose ID is 0×100, has been received as a reception timing in thereception state information.

Next, the misuse detection ECU 2100 receives the second data frame F13whose ID is 0×100 transmitted from the automatic parking ECU 200 a. Themisuse detection ECU 2100 identifies, on the basis of the misusedetection rule (refer to FIG. 13) indicated by the rule information, arange of 47 ms to 53 ms after the timing at which the data frame F11,whose ID is 0×100, has been received as a reception appropriate timeframe T11. Because a reception timing of the data frame F13 falls withinthe reception appropriate time frame T11, the misuse detection ECU 2100determines that the data frame F13 is authorized (not unauthorized).

At this time, the third data frame F14 whose ID is 0×100 is transmittedby the attacker. Because a reception timing of the data frame F14 fallswithin the reception appropriate time frame T11, the data frame F14 canbe regarded as authorized. Since the data frame F13 having the same ID,namely 0×100, has already been received within the reception appropriatetime frame T11, however, either the data frame F13 or the data frame F14is unauthorized. The misuse detection ECU 2100, therefore, determinesthat misuse has occurred with data frames having the ID of 0×100, andupdates the misuse occurrence state of the data frame whose ID is 0×100to “misused” in the reception state information held by the receptionstate holding portion 2156. Thereafter, the misuse detection ECU 2100selects data frames whose IDs are 0×200, which follow data frames whoseIDs are 0×100 in the order of selection, instead of the data frameswhose IDs are 0×100. As a result, reception appropriate time frames areno longer determined on the basis of data frames having the ID of 0×100,which might be misused, and a possibility of erroneously detecting adata frame as an unauthorized data frame is reduced.

The misuse detection ECU 2100 holds a timing at which the data frameF15, whose ID is 0×200, has been received as a reception timing in thereception state information.

Next, the misuse detection ECU 2100 receives the fourth data frame F16whose ID is 0×100 transmitted from the automatic parking ECU 200 a. Themisuse detection ECU 2100 identifies, on the basis of the misusedetection rule (refer to FIG. 13), a range of 22 ms to 28 ms after thetiming at which the data frame F15, whose ID is 0×200, has been receivedas a reception appropriate time frame T12. Because a reception timing ofthe data frame F16 falls within the reception appropriate time frameT12, the misuse detection ECU 2100 determines that the data frame F16 isauthorized.

Next, the misuse detection ECU 2100 receives the fifth data frame F17whose ID is 0×100 transmitted from the attacker. Because a receptiontiming of the data frame F17 falls outside the reception appropriatetime frame T12, the misuse detection ECU 2100 determines that the dataframe F17 is unauthorized.

The misuse detection ECU 2100 then similarly identifies a receptionappropriate time frame T13 on the basis of a reception timing of thedata frame F18, whose ID is 0×200, and determines that the data frameF19, which has been transmitted from the automatic parking ECU 200 a,received in the reception appropriate time frame T13 is authorized andthat the data frame F20, which has been transmitted from the attacker,that has not been received in the reception appropriate time frame T13is unauthorized.

2.7 Second Example of Misuse Detection Operation Performed by MisuseDetection ECU 2100 on Data Frames

FIG. 17 is a diagram illustrating another example in which the misusedetection ECU 2100 receives data frames sequentially appearing on thebuses 300 and performs misuse detection.

In FIG. 17, a situation is illustrated in which data frames F21, F26,F31, and F36 whose IDs are 0×100 periodically transmitted by theautomatic parking ECU 200 a, data frames F24, F29, and F34 whose IDs are0×200 periodically transmitted by the gear ECU 200 c, and data framesF23, F28, F32, and F37 whose IDs are 0×300 periodically transmitted bythe vehicle speed ECU 2200 d sequentially appear on the buses 300. Inaddition, in FIG. 17, a situation is illustrated in which an attacker(unauthorized ECU) that can access the buses 300 periodically transmitsunauthorized data frames F22, F27, F33, and F38 whose IDs are 0×100 andunauthorized data frames F25, F30, and F35 whose IDs are 0×200 to thebuses 300 in order to improperly control the handle 220 and the like. Inthis example, the misuse detection ECU 2100 performs evaluation relatingto misuse on the data frames whose IDs are 0×100 (more specifically,determinations whether the data frames are unauthorized) as misusedetection. FIG. 17 illustrates an example in which, when performingevaluation relating to misuse of the data frames whose IDs are 0×100,the misuse detection ECU 2100 switches, in accordance with a conditionof occurrence of misuse, a data frame that serves as a reference for areception interval to a data frame having an ID with which misuse hasnot occurred. Although not illustrated in FIG. 17, the misuse detectionECU 2100 can perform misuse detection on the data frames whose IDs arenot 0×100.

It is assumed that, in the reception state information held by thereception state holding portion 2156, the misuse occurrence statecorresponding to each ID is “none” at a beginning.

After receiving the first and second data frames F21 and F22 whose IDsare 0×100, the misuse detection ECU 2100 determines that misuse hasoccurred with the data frames whose IDs are 0×100 since a plurality ofdata frames has been received in a reception appropriate time frame, andupdates the misuse occurrence state of the data frame whose ID is 0×100to “misused” in the reception state information held by the receptionstate holding portion 2156. As a result, data frames whose IDs are 0×100will no longer be used as data frames that serve as references fordetermining reception appropriate time frames relating to receptionintervals. In this example, the order of selection of an ID of a dataframe that serves as a reference is 0×100, 0×200, and 0×300.Furthermore, after receiving the first and second data frames F24 andF25 whose IDs are 0×200, the misuse detection ECU 2100 determines thatmisuse has occurred with the data frames whose IDs are 0×200 since aplurality of data frames has been received in a reception appropriatetime frame, and updates the misuse occurrence state of the data framewhose ID is 0×200 to “misused” in the reception state information heldby the reception state holding portion 2156. As a result, data frameswhose IDs are 0×200 will no longer be used as data frames that serve asreferences for determining reception appropriate time frames relating toreception intervals, and data frames whose IDs are 0×300 are selected asreferences.

The misuse detection ECU 2100 identifies a reception appropriate timeframe T21 on the basis of a reception timing of the data frame F23,whose ID is 0×300, and determines whether the third data frame F26 whoseID is 0×100 is unauthorized on the basis of whether the data frame F26has been received in the reception appropriate time frame T21. Becausethe data frame F26 has been received in the reception appropriate timeframe T21, the data frame F26 is determined to be authorized.

The misuse detection ECU 2100 then similarly identifies a receptionappropriate time frame T22 on the basis of a reception timing of thedata frame F28, whose ID is 0×300, and determines that the data frameF31, whose ID is 0×100, received in the reception appropriate time frameT22 is authorized and that the data frame F33 that has not been receivedin the reception appropriate time frame T22 is unauthorized. Inaddition, the misuse detection ECU 2100 identifies a receptionappropriate time frame T23 on the basis of a reception timing of thedata frame F32, whose ID is 0×300, and determines that the data frameF36, whose ID is 0×100, received in the reception appropriate time frameT23 is authorized and that the data frame F38 that has not been receivedin the reception appropriate time frame T23 is unauthorized. It is to benoted that reception intervals between the data frames F23, F28, andF32, whose IDs are 0×300 and which serve as references for identifyingreception appropriate time frames, and the data frames, whose IDs are0×100 and which are subjected to misuse detection, change (increase by 2ms from 36 ms) on the basis of the misuse detection rule (refer to FIG.13) each time a data frame whose ID is 0×100 is received.

2.8 Misuse Detection Process Performed by Misuse Detection ECU 2100

A process performed by the misuse detection ECU 2100 as a misusedetection process when receiving a data frame will be describedhereinafter with reference to a flowchart of FIG. 18.

The misuse detection ECU 2100 receives a data frame from the buses 300(step S2101).

The misuse detection ECU 2100 checks, on the basis of the ruleinformation (refer to FIG. 13) held by the rule holding portion 2154,whether a misuse detection rule relating to an ID of the received dataframe is specified (step S2102). If a misuse detection rule relating tothe ID of the received data frame is not specified, the misuse detectionECU 2100 ends the process corresponding to the reception of one dataframe.

If checking in step S2102 that a misuse detection rule relating to theID of the received data frame is specified, the misuse detection ECU2100 updates a reception timing and a next reception timing candidate inthe reception state information (refer to FIG. 14) (step S2103). Morespecifically, in step S2103, the misuse detection ECU 2100 sets a valueof the next reception timing candidate to the reception timing in thereception state information (that is, updates the reception timing withthe value of the next reception timing candidate) and updates the nextreception timing candidate to “none” for, among all IDs whose nextreception timing candidates are not “none” in the reception stateinformation, an ID with which the current timing obtained from the timerholding portion 155 indicates that an end of a reception appropriatetime frame corresponding to the ID has come. In addition, in step S2103,if there is no ID for which the current timing obtained from the timerholding portion 155 indicates that an end of a reception appropriatetime frame corresponding to the ID has come among all the IDs whose nextreception timing candidates are not “none” in the reception stateinformation, the misuse detection ECU 2100 does nothing.

After step S2103, the misuse detection ECU 2100 selects an ID with whichmisuse has not yet occurred (an ID whose misuse occurrence state is “notmisused” in the reception state information) as an ID of a data framethat serves as a reference for identifying a reception appropriate timeframe (step S2104). The selection is performed, for example, on thebasis of a selection criterion (selection order or the like) indicatingthat a smaller ID value of a data frame relating to the misuse detectionrule indicated by the rule information (refer to FIG. 13) takespriority. In this case, IDs can be selected in order of 0×100, 0×200,and 0×300.

The misuse detection ECU 2100 refers to the reception state informationheld by the reception state holding portion 2156 to obtain a receptiontiming of a data frame having the selected ID. The misuse detection ECU2100 then refers to the misuse detection rule indicated by the ruleinformation held by the rule holding portion 2154 and identifies areception appropriate time frame through calculation according to areception interval and margins determined from the reception timing ofthe data frame having the selected ID that serves as a reference and theID of the received data frame (step S2105).

Next, the misuse detection ECU 2100 determines whether the timing atwhich the data frame has been received (that is, the current timingobtained from the timer holding portion 155) falls within the receptionappropriate time frame. If the timing at which the data frame has beenreceived does not fall within the reception appropriate time frame, themisuse detection ECU 2100 determines that the received data frame isunauthorized (step S2107), updates a misuse occurrence statecorresponding to the ID of the data frame to “misused” in the receptionstate information (step S2108), and ends the process.

If determining in step S2106 that the timing at which the data frame hasbeen received falls within the reception appropriate time frame, themisuse detection ECU 2100 checks whether the next reception timingcandidate corresponding to the ID of the received data frame is “none”in the reception state information (step S2109). If the next receptiontiming candidate is not “none”, the misuse detection ECU 2100 determinesthat the ID of the received data frame is unauthorized (step S2107),updates the misuse occurrence state corresponding to the ID of the dataframe to “misused” (step S2108), and ends the process. When the nextreception timing candidate is not “none”, either the received data frameor a data frame received immediately before the foregoing data frame isunauthorized. It is to be noted that, in a determination whether a dataframe is unauthorized, occurrence of misuse of each data frame andoccurrence of misuse of one or more data frames having the same ID mayor may not be distinguished, In any case, however, the misuse detectionECU 2100 updates a misuse occurrence state to “none” in the receptionstate information and no longer uses data frames having the same ID asthe data frame relating to the misuse as references for identifyingreception appropriate time frames.

If checking in step S2109 that the next reception timing candidatecorresponding to the ID of the received data frame is “none” in thereception state information, the misuse detection ECU 2100 determinesthat the received data frame is authorized, sets the current timing tothe next reception timing candidate corresponding to the ID of the dataframe in the reception state information (step S2110), and ends theprocess. That is, in step S2110, the misuse detection ECU 2100 updatesthe next reception timing candidate with the current timing obtainedfrom the timer holding portion 155 and ends the process corresponding tothe reception of one data frame.

The misuse detection process performed by the misuse detection ECU 2100thus includes a reception step (step S2101) of receiving a data frametransmitted through the buses 300. In addition, the misuse detectionprocess includes an initial detection step (e.g., steps S2102 to S2106)of evaluating whether a data frame is a target data frame, which is adata frame having a first identifier (e.g., an ID of 0×100), inaccordance with an interval between reception timings of two target dataframes as misuse detection for a target data frame. In this initialdetection step, if, as misuse detection for a target data frame, areception timing of the target data frame falls outside an appropriatetime frame, which is predetermined on the basis of a reception timing ofa target data frame that precedes the reception timing, or if thereception timing of the target data frame falls within the receptionappropriate time frame and another target data frame has been receivedin the reception appropriate time frame, it is determined that thetarget data frame is unauthorized (steps S2109, S2107, and S2108). Themisuse detection in the initial detection step is then stopped after itis evaluated in the initial detection step that the target data frame isunauthorized, and misuse detection starts in a detection step in which areference for the reception appropriate time frame has been switched. Inthe detection step, evaluation (a determination whether a data frame isunauthorized or the like) is performed (e.g., steps S2102 to S2110 orthe like) in accordance with a reception timing of a reference dataframe, which is a data frame having a second identifier (e.g., an ID of0×200) different from the first identifier, and a reception timing of atarget data frame on the basis of a certain rule (that is, a misusedetection rule indicated by rule information) specifying a receptioninterval between the reference data frame and the target data frame. Inaddition, the misuse detection process includes a reference detectionstep (e.g., step S2106, S2109, or the like) of performing misusedetection on the reference data frame. In the misuse detection process,if it is detected in the reference detection step that the referencedata frame is unauthorized, the misuse detection in the detection stepis stopped, and misuse detection starts in a subsequent detection step.In the subsequent detection step, as the misuse detection for the targetdata frame, evaluation is performed (e.g., steps S2102 to S2107 or thelike) in accordance with a reception timing of another reference dataframe, which is a data frame having a third identifier (e.g., an ID of0×300) different from the first identifier or the second identifier, andthe reception timing of the target data frame on the basis of a rule(misuse detection rule) specifying a reception interval between theother reference data frame and the target data frame. In addition, themisuse detection process can include a recording step of recording aresult of the evaluation in the detection step in a storage medium.

2.9 Effects Produced by Second Embodiment

In the vehicle network system 11 according to the second embodiment, themisuse detection ECU 2100 performs evaluation relating to misuse of adata frame (a determination whether a data frame is unauthorized or thelike) on the basis of a reception interval between the data framesubjected to the evaluation and a data frame that serves as a referenceand with which occurrence of misuse has not yet been detected. Aftermisuse occurs with the data frame that serves as a reference, anotherframe is selected and used as a reference. That is, the misuse detectionECU 2100 makes a determination relating to misuse of a data frame or thelike on the basis of a reception interval between a data frame withwhich misuse has not occurred and a data frame subjected to the misusedetection.

As a result, transmission of an unauthorized data frame performed by anattacker (an unauthorized ECU that accesses the buses 300 or the like)can be detected, and a possibility of determining an authorized dataframe to be unauthorized is reduced.

OTHER EMBODIMENTS

The first and second embodiments have been described above as examplesof the techniques according to the present disclosure. The techniquesaccording to the present disclosure, however, are not limited to theseand may be applied to embodiments obtained by appropriately makingmodifications, replacement, addition, omission, or the like to the firstand second embodiments. For example, the following modifications arealso included in embodiments of the present disclosure.

(1) Although the misuse detection process portions 152 and 2152 havebeen described as components of the misuse detection ECUs 100 and 2100,respectively, in the above embodiments, the misuse detection processportions 152 and 2152 may be components of other ECUs, instead. Any ECUmay perform misuse detection (evaluation relating to misuse or the like)on a data frame.

(2) Although a data frame according to the CAN protocol is described inthe standard ID format in the above embodiments, an extended ID formatmay be used, instead. In the case of the extended ID format, an ID of adata frame is indicated by a total of 29 bits including a base ID at anID position in the standard ID format and an extended ID.

(3) The misuse detection ECU 100 or 2100 in the above embodiments mayperform misuse detection on a data frame after reception of the dataframe is completed or while the data frame is being received (morespecifically, at an arbitrary point of time after an ID field isreceived),

(4) Although the misuse detection ECU 100 or 2100 holds a receptiontiming of a data frame and checks that a reception interval with marginshas ended on the basis of the reception timing in the above embodiments,the misuse detection ECUs 100 and 2100 need not necessarily hold areception timing of a data frame. For example, the misuse detection ECU100 or 2100 may check that a reception interval has ended by setting thereception interval to a countdown timer when a data frame is received,instead.

(5) Although the misuse detection ECU 100 or 2100 notifies the otherECUs of occurrence of misuse, count and record an accumulated number oftimes of detection of misuse, record log information, or report misuse,for example, if it is detected that a data frame is unauthorized in theabove embodiments, any other type of processing may be performed,instead. For example, if it is detected that a data frame isunauthorized while the data frame is being received, the misusedetection ECU 100 or 2100 may transmit an error frame to the buses 300in order to invalidate the unauthorized data frame and prevent the ECUsfrom processing the unauthorized data frame as usual.

(6) Although an example in which a determination whether a data frame isunauthorized (that is, an alternative determination) is made asevaluation relating to misuse for the data frame subjected to misusedetection has been described in the above embodiments, the evaluationrelating to misuse is not limited to a determination. For example,evaluation in which a likelihood (e.g., probability) of misuse iscalculated may be performed, instead. The calculation of the likelihoodthat a data frame is unauthorized can be achieved, for example, by thefollowing method. Whereas data frames (or IDs of the data frames) thatserve as references for calculating reception appropriate time framesare sequentially selected in the misuse detection process in the secondembodiment, reception appropriate time frames in this case are notselected but obtained using data frames of all IDs included in themisuse detection rule (refer to FIG. 13). A reception timing of a dataframe subjected to misuse detection is then compared with a receptionappropriate time frame group, which is obtained by overlapping all thereception appropriate time frames. The misuse detection ECU can evaluatethat the likelihood of misuse is low when the reception timing of thedata frame subjected to misuse detection is a time at which a degree ofoverlap between the reception appropriate time frames in the receptionappropriate time frame group is high and that the likelihood of misuseis high when the reception timing of the data frame subjected to misusedetection is a time at which the degree of overlap is low or a timeoutside any of the reception appropriate time frames. This evaluation,for example, is evaluation in which the likelihood of misuse iscalculated through a certain calculation based on the misuse detectionrule (refer to FIG. 13) as a group of rules specifying receptionintervals between data frames of a plurality of IDs and a data framesubjected to misuse detection, reception timings of the data frames, andthe reception timing of the data frame subjected to the misusedetection. The content of the certain calculation for calculating thelikelihood of misuse can be arbitrarily determined. It is to be notedthat an alternative determination whether a data frame is unauthorizedmay be made by comparing the likelihood of misuse with a threshold.Alternatively, a determination whether a data frame is unauthorized maybe made while obtaining reception appropriate time frames using dataframes of the plurality of IDs included in the misuse detection rule(refer to FIG. 13) as references, and whether the data frame subjectedto misuse detection is unauthorized may be eventually determined by amajority vote, for example, by accumulating results of evaluationwhether a reception timing of the data frame subjected to the misusedetection is included in the reception appropriate time frames (that is,results of evaluation whether the data frame is unauthorized). It is tobe noted that, in addition to the majority vote, for example, the dataframe subjected to the misuse detection may be determined to beunauthorized if the reception timing of the data frame is not includedin any of the plurality of reception appropriate time frames.

(7) Although an example in which data frames (that is, IDs of the dataframes) that serve as references for identifying reception appropriatetime frames are selected in ascending order of an ID value in the misusedetection process has been described in the above embodiments, the ordermay be determined by another method, instead. For example, IDs withwhich misuse has not occurred may be selected in descending order of theID value, Alternatively, data frames may be selected while adding acondition that the ID value be larger or smaller than an ID of a dataframe subjected to misuse detection. Alternatively, data frames whose IDvalues are closer to an ID value of a data frame subjected to misusedetection may be selected first. Alternatively, data frames whosereception intervals specified as reference data frames are closer to areception interval between data frames subjected to misuse detection maybe selected first.

(8) Although an example in which data frames (that is, IDs of the dataframes) that serve as references for identifying reception appropriatetime frames are selected in descending order of an ID value in themisuse detection process has been described in the above embodiments,the order need not be determined, instead. For example, IDs may berandomly selected, or a selected ID may be regularly changed (e.g,changed to a randomly selected ID). Alternatively, an ID to be selectedmay be switched in accordance with a current state of a vehicle (avehicle on which the ECUs are mounted). That is, after a state of thevehicle changes, an ID to be selected may be switched on the basis of aselection criterion in which an ID of a data frame to be selected foreach state of the vehicle is predetermined. The state of the vehicle canbe a stationary state, a running state, or the like. Various statesidentified with the sensors and the devices mounted on the vehicle canbe used as states of the vehicle. For example, a state in which anignition key is inserted into an ignition key cylinder, a state in whichan engine has started, a gear position state (e.g., parking, neutral,first gear, second gear, or the like), a state of a network load uponthe buses 300 or the like, and the like can be used as the states of thevehicle. In addition, the state of the vehicle can be identified on thebasis of a change in the content of a data frame flowing through thebuses 300, the necessity of misuse detection, or the like.

(9) In the above embodiments, an example has been described in which areception timing of a data frame received first among data framesreceived in a reception appropriate time frame is stored as a nextreception timing candidate included in the reception state informationheld by the reception state holding portion 2156 and a value of the nextreception timing candidate is set to a reception timing in the receptionstate information after the reception appropriate time frame ends. This,however, is just an example. As a reception timing included in thereception state information that serves as a reference for a nextreception appropriate time frame, for example, a reception timing of adata frame received last among data frames received in a receptionappropriate time frame may be set, or a reception timing of a data framereceived at a timing closest to when a reception interval indicated bythe misuse detection rule ends may be set. It is to be noted thatalthough a misuse occurrence state included in the reception stateinformation becomes “misused” if a plurality of data frames are receivedin a reception appropriate time frame in the above embodiments, themisuse occurrence state may become “misused” only if a predeterminednumber of data frames or more are received in a reception appropriatetime frame.

(10) Although an example in which a misuse occurrence state included inthe reception state information held by the reception state holdingportion 2156 does not change once set to “misused” has been described inabove embodiments, the misuse occurrence state may be changed to “notmisused” under a certain condition, instead. For example, the misuseoccurrence state may be changed to “not misused” if it is checked acertain number of times that only one data frame having an applicable IDhas been received in a reception appropriate time frame, or the misuseoccurrence state may be regularly reset to “not misused”.

(11) Although the misuse detection rule indicated by the ruleinformation held by the rule holding portion 154 or 2154 includes rulesrelating to reception intervals for a plurality of IDs in the aboveembodiments, rules relating to reception intervals need not be specifiedfor all IDs that can be used for data frames communicated through thebuses 300. In addition, the misuse detection rule may include, for dataframes of all IDs or some Ds, rules (e.g., restriction of data length,the content of a data field, or the like) that serve as references forevaluation relating to misuse of a data frame (a determination whether adata frame is unauthorized or the like) as well as the rules relating toreception intervals.

(12) In the above embodiments, an example has been described in which amisuse occurrence state included in the reception state information heldby the reception state holding portion 2156 is changed to “misused” if aplurality of data frames having an applicable ID are received in areception appropriate time frame or if a data frame having an applicableID is received outside a reception appropriate time frame. This is justan example, and, for example, a misuse occurrence state of an applicableID may be changed to “misused” if it is detected that a data frame thatdoes not comply with a rule other than that about a reception intervalhas been transmitted, instead.

(13) Although the microcontroller section 150 or 2150 performs themisuse detection process in the above embodiments, the controllersection 140 may perform the entirety or a part of the misuse detectionprocess, instead.

(14) Although a reception timing included in the reception stateinformation is not updated until a reception appropriate time frame endsin order to determine whether a data frame is authorized or not on thebasis of a reception interval in the above embodiments, the receptiontiming included in the reception state information may be updated at atiming at which a data frame has been received in a receptionappropriate time frame, instead. Alternatively, the reception timingneed not be updated each time a data frame is received in a receptionappropriate time frame. For example, a reception appropriate time framemay be calculated by holding a number of times of reception andmultiplying a reception interval relating to the misuse detection ruleindicated by the rule information and the number of times of reception,instead. At this time, the number of times of reception may be reset andthe reception timing at this time may be updated at arbitrary timings.

(15) Although an example in which the microcontroller section 150 or themicrocontroller section 2150 includes the rule holding portion 154 or2154, the timer holding portion 155, the reception timing holdingportion 156, and the reception state holding portion 2156 has beendescribed in the above embodiments, the controller section 140 mayinclude at least one of the rule holding portion 154 or 2154, the timerholding portion 155, the reception timing holding portion 156, and thereception state holding portion 2156.

(16) Although a reception appropriate time frame extends from a valueobtained by subtracting a margin from a reception interval indicated bythe rule information held by the rule holding portion 2154 to a valueobtained by adding a margin to the reception interval as a method foridentifying a reception appropriate time frame in the above embodiments,a reception appropriate time frame is not limited to this. For example,a reception appropriate time frame may be the entirety of a time rangethat begins with a value obtained by subtracting a margin from thereception interval indicated by the rule information, instead.

(17) In the above embodiments, a data frame flowing through the buses300 is used as a data frame that serves as a reference for checking areception interval between the data frame and a data frame subjected tomisuse detection, the foregoing data frame having an ID different froman ID of the data frame subjected to misuse detection. The data framethat serves as a reference may be a data frame for control purposes orstate notification purposes to be caused to flow through the buses 300,or may be a dummy data frame that has no purposes other than for misusedetection. Dummy data frames are periodically transmitted by one of theECUs and received by the misuse detection ECU, and need not be receivedby any ECU other than the misuse detection ECU. The misuse detection ECUcan perform misuse detection while identifying a reception appropriatetime frame for a data frame having an ID subjected to misuse detectionusing a reception timing of the dummy data frame as a reference.Alternatively, the misuse detection ECU may use a data frame having anID different from an ID subjected to misuse detection as a data framethat serves as a reference for the misuse detection, the data framebeing transmitted by an ECU that transmits a data frame having the IDsubjected to the misuse detection.

(18) Although the misuse detection ECUs and the other ECUs in the aboveembodiments are, for example, devices including digital circuits, analogcircuits, communication circuits, and the like such as processors andmemories, the misuse detection ECUs and the other ECUs may include otherhardware components such as displays, keyboards, and mice, instead. Inaddition, instead of achieving the functions in a software manner withthe processors that execute control programs stored in the memories, thefunctions may be achieved by dedicated hardware (digital circuits or thelike).

(19) Some or all of the components of each device in the aboveembodiments may be configured by a single system large scale integration(LSI) circuit, The system LSI circuit is a super-multifunctional LSIcircuit fabricated by integrating a plurality of components on a singlechip and is specifically a computer system configured by including amicroprocessor, a ROM, a RAM, and the like. In the RAM, a computerprogram is recorded. When the microprocessor operates in accordance withthe computer program, the system LSI circuit achieves functions thereof.Alternatively, each of the components configuring each device may beindividually achieved as a chip, or some or all of the components may beachieved as a chip. Although a term “system LSI” is used here, a term“IC”, “LSI”, “super LSI”, or “ultra LSI” might be used depending on adegree of integration. In addition, a method for fabricating anintegrated circuit is not limited to LSI, and an integrated circuit maybe achieved by a dedicated circuit or a multipurpose processor. Anfield-programmable gate array (FPGA) capable of performing programmingor a reconfigurable processor capable of reconfiguring connections andsettings of circuit cells inside the LSI circuit may be used after anLSI circuit is fabricated. Furthermore, if a technique for fabricatingan integrated circuit that replaces LSI appears as a result of evolutionof semiconductor technologies or other derivative technologies, functionblocks may be obviously integrated using the technique. Application of abiotechnology is one of such possibilities is.

(20) Some or all of the components of each device may be configured byan IC card or an independent module removably attached to the device.The IC card or the module is a computer system configured by amicroprocessor, a ROM, a RAM, and the like. The IC card or the modulemay include the super-multifunctional LSI circuit. The IC card or themodule achieves functions thereof when the microprocessor operates inaccordance with a computer program. The IC card or the module may betamper-resistant.

(21) The order of execution of the procedures of the various processesdescribed in the above embodiments (e.g., the processing proceduresillustrated in FIGS. 10 and 18 and the like) need not necessarily belimited to that illustrated. The order of execution may be switched, aplurality of procedures may be performed in parallel with one another,or a part of a procedure may be omitted, insofar as the scope of theinvention is not deviated from.

(22) An aspect of the present disclosure, for example, may be a misusedetection method including the entirety or a part of the misusedetection process illustrated in FIG. 10 or 18 or the like. In addition,an aspect of the present disclosure may be a computer program thatachieves this method using a computer, or may be a digital signalconfigured by the computer program. In addition, an aspect of thepresent disclosure may be the computer program or the digital signalrecorded in a computer-readable recording medium such as a flexibledisk, a hard disk, a CD-ROM, a magneto-optical (MO) disk, a digitalversatile disc (DVD), a DVD-ROM, a DVD-RAM, a Blu-ray Disc (BD;registered trademark), or a semiconductor memory. In addition, an aspectof the present disclosure may be the computer program or the digitalsignal transmitted through an electrical communication line, a wirelessor wired communication line, a network typified by the Internet,datacasting or the like. In addition, an aspect of the presentdisclosure is a computer system including a microprocessor and a memory.The computer program may be recorded in the memory, and themicroprocessor may operate in accordance with the computer program. Inaddition, the present disclosure may be implemented by anotherindependent computer system by recording the program or the digitalsignal in one of the recording media and transporting the recordingmedium or by transporting the program or the digital signal through thenetwork or the like.

(23) An aspect of the present disclosure may be, for example, a misusedetection system including some or all of the functions of one of theabove-described misuse detection ECUs. The misuse detection system canbe configured, for example, by an ECU connected to buses (may be amisuse detection ECU or another ECU), a device that can communicate withthe ECU (e.g., a server apparatus located outside a vehicle or thelike), and the like.

(24) The scope of the present disclosure also includes modes achieved byarbitrarily combining the components and the functions described in theabove embodiments and modifications.

The present disclosure can be used for appropriately detectingtransmission of an unauthorized frame to buses in a vehicle networkaccording to a CAN.

What is claimed is:
 1. A misuse detection method used in a vehiclenetwork system including a plurality of electronic control units thatcommunicate with one another through buses in accordance with acontroller area network protocol, the misuse detection methodcomprising: receiving a target data frame and a reference data framewhich are transmitted through the buses, wherein the target data frameis a data frame having a first identifier and wherein the reference dataframe is a data frame having a second identifier different from thefirst identifier; and performing, as misuse detection for the targetdata frame, evaluation in accordance with a reception timing of thereference data frame and a reception timing of the target data frame onthe basis of a certain rule specifying a reception interval between thereference data frame and the target data frame.
 2. The misuse detectionmethod according to claim 1, wherein, in the performing evaluation, if arelationship between the reception timing of the target data frame andthe reception timing of the reference data frame complies with thecertain rule, it is evaluated that the target data frame is notunauthorized, and if the relationship does not comply with the certainrule, it is evaluated that the target data frame is unauthorized.
 3. Themisuse detection method according to claim 1, wherein the certain rulespecifies an appropriate range of the reception interval, and wherein,in the performing evaluation, if a difference between the receptiontiming of the target data frame and the reception timing of thereference data frame prior to the foregoing reception timing fallswithin the appropriate range, it is evaluated that the certain rule iscomplied with.
 4. The misuse detection method according to claim 1,further comprising: evaluating, as misuse detection for the target dataframe, whether the target data frame is unauthorized in accordance withan interval between the reception timing of the target data frame and areception timing of a target data frame prior to the foregoing receptiontiming, wherein the misuse detection in the evaluating is performedprior to the misuse detection in the performing evaluation and after itis evaluated in the evaluating that the target data frame isunauthorized, the misuse detection in the evaluating is stopped and themisuse detection in the performing evaluation starts.
 5. The misusedetection method according to claim 4, wherein, in the evaluating, ifthe reception timing of the target data frame falls outside anappropriate time frame predetermined on the basis of the receptiontiming of the target data frame prior to the foregoing reception timing,or if the reception timing of the target data frame falls within theappropriate time frame and another target data is received at a timingwithin the appropriate time frame, it is evaluated as the misusedetection for the target data frame that the target data frame isunauthorized.
 6. The misuse detection method according to claim 1,wherein, in the receiving, another reference data frame is receivedtransmitted through the buses, and wherein, the other reference dataframe is a data frame having a third identifier different from the firstidentifier or the second identifier, the misuse detection method furthercomprises: performing misuse detection for the reference data frame; andsubsequently performing, as misuse detection for the target data frame,evaluation in accordance with a reception timing of the other referencedata frame and the reception timing of the target data frame on thebasis of a rule specifying a reception interval between the otherreference data frame and the target data frame, wherein, if it isdetected in the performing misuse detection that the reference dataframe is unauthorized, the misuse detection in the performing evaluationis stopped and the misuse detection in the subsequently performingstarts.
 7. The misuse detection method according to claim 6, wherein themisuse detection in the performing evaluation starts after one of aplurality of identifiers different from the first identifier selected inaccordance with a predetermined selection criterion is determined as thesecond identifier, and the misuse detection in the subsequentlyperforming starts after one of a plurality of identifiers different fromthe first identifier or the second identifier selected in accordancewith the predetermined selection criterion is determined as the thirdidentifier.
 8. The misuse detection method according to claim 1, whereinthe misuse detection in the performing evaluation is performed after oneof a plurality of identifiers different from the first identifier, theone of the plurality of identifiers being an identifier of a data framewith which misuse has not yet been detected, is determined as the secondidentifier.
 9. The misuse detection method according to claim 1, whereinthe misuse detection in the performing evaluation is performed after oneof a plurality of identifiers different from the first identifier isdetermined as the second identifier in accordance with a state of avehicle on which the plurality of electronic control units are mounted.10. The misuse detection method according to claim 1, wherein, in theperforming evaluation, the evaluation whether the target data frame isunauthorized is performed in accordance with a reception timing of eachof at least one data frame each having an identifier different from thefirst identifier or the second identifier and the reference data frameand the reception timing of the target data frame on the basis of agroup of rules including the certain rule specifying a receptioninterval between each of the at least one data frame and the referencedata frame and the target data frame, and whether the target data frameis unauthorized is determined on the basis of a result of theevaluation.
 11. The misuse detection method according to claim 1,wherein, in the performing evaluation, the evaluation is performed bycalculating a likelihood that the target data frame is unauthorizedthrough a certain calculation based on a group of rules including thecertain rule specifying a reception interval between each of at leastone data frame each having an identifier different from the firstidentifier or the second identifier and the reference data frame and thetarget data frame, a reception timing of each of the at least one dataframe and the reference data frame, and the reception timing of thetarget data frame.
 12. The misuse detection method according to claim 1,further comprising: recording a result of the evaluation performed inthe performing evaluation in a storage medium.
 13. A misuse detectionelectronic control unit in a vehicle network system including aplurality of electronic control units that communicate with one anotherthrough buses in accordance with a controller area network protocol, themisuse detection electronic control unit comprising: a receiver thatreceives a target data frame and a reference data frame which aretransmitted through the buses, wherein the target data frame is a dataframe having a first identifier and wherein the reference data frame isa data frame having a second identifier different from the firstidentifier; a rule holder that holds rule information indicating acertain rule specifying a reception interval between the target dataframe and the reference data frame; and a detector that performs, asmisuse detection for the target data frame, evaluation in accordancewith a reception timing of the reference data frame and a receptiontiming of the target data frame on the basis of the certain rule.
 14. Amisuse detection system for misuse detection in a vehicle network systemincluding a plurality of electronic control units that communicate withone another through buses in accordance with a controller area networkprotocol, the misuse detection system comprising: a receiver thatreceives a target data frame and a reference data frame which aretransmitted through the buses, wherein the target data frame is a dataframe having a first identifier and wherein the reference data frame isa data frame having a second identifier different from the firstidentifier; a rule holder that holds rule information indicating acertain rule specifying a reception interval between the target dataframe and the reference data frame; and a detector that performs, asmisuse detection for the target data frame, evaluation in accordancewith a reception timing of the reference data frame and a receptiontiming of the target data frame on the basis of the certain rule.